Take the 2-minute tour ×
Chinese Language Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for students, teachers, and linguists wanting to discuss the finer points of the Chinese language. It's 100% free, no registration required.

On a database file, the designer uses chi and zho to tell simplified Chinese and traditional Chinese. It's hard to tell whether chi means the simplified one or traditional.

Seemingly, chi is derived from the first three characters of "Chinese", zho from the first three of "Zhōngwén".

The wiki page of Chinese language, as well as the following two links from ISO 639 documentation, chi and zho, all tell us that chi is ISO 639-2/B, where the B stands for bibliographic, zho being ISO 639-2/T, T for terminological. The explanation of the B and T codes does not shed any light on traditional-or-simplified information the either.

But there is nowhere that I can refer to showing which one representing the traditional Chinese.

share|improve this question
1  
It seems that the designer chose the two labels deliberately, which as you've already pointed out that there's no way to tell which is TC or SC. I think the only way to figure out is to dump the database and examine some of the text data. –  TactMayers Mar 10 at 9:16
1  
I'll bet that the designer takes "zho" to mean simplified Chinese and "chi" to mean traditional Chinese. Reason: "zhong" is a mainland-style "Pinyin" transcription, and in regions where traditional Chinese is used (such as Taiwan and Hong Kong), "Pinyin" is not the default phonetic system. –  user4086 Mar 10 at 10:14
add comment

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

chi and zho stands for the Chinese language, but not one of its writing forms.

Specific codes for traditional Chinese and simplified Chinese widely in use being zh-Hant and zh-Hans respectively, specified by IETF and also RFC 5646.

The use of improvised codes "tc" and "sc", which abbreviate "Traditional Chinese" and "Simplified Chinese", are often observed too in Chinese websites.

So, just as @TactMayers said in the comment, I also think that the designer chose them deliberately, or simply due to misunderstanding.

By the way, here may not be a right place for this question; Stack Overflow is more suitable.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.