2

啰 seems to be the simplified version of 囉 these days, but....these are two examples from 《四川方言词典》circa '87 that I found:

enter image description here

要飞啰

enter image description here

我是乌梢蛇打店——长客囉!

Most the entries I've seen in these 八零后 books have all been written 囉 and I just assumed it was a later simplification but obviously 啰 as a character also existed at the same time!

  • What's The Difference Between 啰 And 囉 In Old(er) Texts?

...seems like there is no difference between the two nowadays...

edit:

ok

“～囉”

hi

拐啰

and the most crazy of them all:

ha

at the top:

涮啰

in the def:

涮囉

| improve this question | |
3

This may be a failure of editing. 啰 is actually discussed in the 1986 Jianhuazi zong biao. According to the 1986 zong biao, 罗 was included in the first list of simplified characters, but 囉 was not. The 1986 zong biao deletes 囉, and makes 啰 its official replacement "by analogy". Your dictionary seems to fall right in this period. Could be the entry you cite with 囉 was written before the 1986 list came out, and the entry with 啰 was done after. Or perhaps both were originally 囉 and in the editing they did after completing the dictionary, they missed the one entry.

| improve this answer | |
  • It isn't just one entry though. I'll edit later. They seem to intentionally differentiate the two. – Mo.♦ Jul 14 '15 at 7:46
  • updated my question – Mo.♦ Jul 18 '15 at 5:45
  • 1
    Hm, the last one is suggestive. 啰 only appears in the heading, and in the definition it is always 囉. I still think the answer I gave above fits the case. The book was prepared before the 1986 list came out, and used 囉 everywhere. The list comes out, the editors go 'oy!', fix the headings, dust off their butts, and go home. – wpt Jul 18 '15 at 6:53
  • 1
    Hey I don't blame them. Imagine you finish the report for your federal grant and they send it back to you with a letter saying that all official documents must now use British spelling. I can think of a good non-verbal response for that one. – wpt Jul 18 '15 at 7:00
  • 1
    Find "o" -> Replace "ou" - I'm sure that would work out okay.... ;) – Mo.♦ Jul 18 '15 at 7:01

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.