As I study usage of different aspects markers in Chinese, I started to realize that my problems with those markers come from simple fact that: "I don't see any use in them." Reason for this is: Whenever I see a bare verb phrase, I translate it as simple present time. But this is far from truth.
So, let me ask a question:
"Why does 他吃了饭. sound incomplete?" This kind of sentence is being used in many theoretical talks and papers on chinese linguistics
My answers: The difference between 他吃饭 and 他吃了饭 lies only in that 了 renders the situation as factual rather then irreal (habitual, desirable, wishing, issuing a command and ect.)
他吃饭 can be translated (in proper context) as:
- An order. "He (must) eat (now)!" (screaming).
- A habit. He eats (always).
- A desire. He (wants/thingking about) to eat.
But once you add 了 to a verb(as in 他吃了饭), you thus delete all the mentioned above as a possible translations. Now the situation is "factual \actual". It is not about habit, orders, desires and other irrealis modes. But rendering situation factual is not enougth, you still have a big list of possible translations (in proper context), for example:
- A fact. He ate.
- A fact. He eats... and then... (not as a habit, but actually eats as in some narrative)
- A fact. He just intiated a process of eating.
- Future. He will have eaten (by the time ...)
- any suggestions?
that is why in 他吃了饭 you need futher specification! The verb 吃了 is not rendered to ANY time (just rendered to reality, making it a fact or eventuality)!!!
P.S. Please, refrain from "perfective aspect marker 了" viewpoint if it is possible. Thank you!
P.s.s. Please, provide your possible translations and contextes for 他吃了饭 (this is very important for not natives! We need to see the point in adding aspects to naked verbs!!!)