I am currently reading a history book by P. Zarrow on the period between 1840 and 1949. When commenting the emergence of vernacular Chinese (pioneered f.e. by 胡適)he makes sparse comments about the views of the opponents of vernacular.

In particular, it struck me that the opponents supposedly said, the "vernacular" was almost as alien to the populace as Classical Chinese (文言文). And as the reason for this they stated the influence of Western Grammar! Zarrow writes that, while speaking of 瞿秋白,though not explicitly stating that he said it.

Now, looking at what 胡適 advocated in a poem of his, it seems not to have been any difficult vernacular -such as 紅樓夢, on which he was a master- but pretty much modern mandarin

都是平常情感。 都是平常言語。 偶然碰著個詩人。 變幻出多少新奇詩句!

So, I wonder:

  1. What strong western grammatical influence was there in the vernacular of this era? I searched hard and found only a few minor inventions (like 她它牠,妳), of which most have died out. Surely, this was not so hard for the people!
  2. Where these really an obstacle, or was it rather the myriads of dialects, spoken since time immemorial?

2 Answers 2


Regarding to how early writers are influenced by western languages. The renowned poet and translator 余光中 has written quite a lot about it. Below are some examples he mentioned in his articles.

Deliberate plurals. Traditionally plurals are only used when absolutely necessary. In the following sentence the reader doesn't actually care whether it's one fly, a group of flies, or fly as a species. Therefore, it's better to leave it out.

战士战死了的时候,苍蝇们所首先发现的是他的缺点和伤痕…… ——鲁迅《战士和苍蝇》

Deliberate plurals, and apparent western pronoun-phrase -- "your total extinction". A colloquial way to say it is 我诅咒你们全灭.


Yes we know you've been to Cambridge. We can totally tell. "不曾知道过" is an imitation of the English past participate "haven't known". "更大的愉快" is an imitation of the English comparative "greater happiness". In whole it looks like an awkward English sentence being translated to awkward Chinese. 我不知道什么比这更愉快 would be much better.


Typical stacked modifiers. Very unsinological I'd say. It's not even good English. With English you can use clauses to right-branch a sentence, with modifiers trailing behind, theoretically ad infinitum. With Chinese, all modifiers are supposed to put at the left side. If the modifiers gets overabundant, the sentence would be very hard to digest. Usually this kind of sentences should be completely restructured.

我这本书只预备给一些“本身已离开了学校,或始终就无从接近学校,还认识 些中国文字,置身于文学理论、文学批评以及说谎造谣消息所达不到的那种职务上, 在那个社会里生活,而且极关心全个民族在空间与时间下所有的好处与坏处”的人 去看。——沈从文《边城》

Another example of stacked modifiers.


余光中 went on to say that some of the writers, including 鲁迅 and 胡适, are already excellent 文言文 writers, but when they write 白话文, they tend to lose themselves and incorporate western language features into their articles. 鲁迅 even did this deliberately because he thought the contemporary Chinese wasn't expressive enough and it had to be improved this way.

At first this was only a literary vernacular, but they do pierce into the spoken language. Modern mandarin is already a conglomerate because of the influence of early 白话文 and their authors. In late 1970s 余光中 even proposed to eradicate 恶性西化 in Chinese.

  • Very helpful! As a Western speaker, I have trouble imagining the authentic Chinese way of saying these. Could you add some examples? This topic truly interests me in every aspect, especially since one of my native languages is Greek and we had a transition from a kind of 文言文 to 白話文 in the late twentieth century. While it was understandable, because it discriminated in favour of educated people such as myself, modern Greek is yet to reach the versatility of high Greek...
    – Ludi
    Aug 6, 2016 at 10:54
  • @Ludi I've added a few elaborations. I'm no expert in this; it just happens that I've read something related :) Aug 7, 2016 at 12:58
  • For anyone who is interested, I believe this is the article that Wang Dingwei refers to: zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/31371889
    – Buddy L
    Apr 4 at 16:05
  1. Little, I would say. The new cultural movement was about opposing the west, not embracing it. Apart from loan words and interpunctuation, there has been a gradual increase in long and complicated sentences with many relative clauses joined with 的. Perhaps using 被 in a neutral fashion rather than only negative also has western influence.

  2. Why would the people accept artificial injections into the language? It is like the debate in some western countries about introducing yet another, ”gender neutral” pronoun. Languages tend to evolve into simplicity, so the natural step would be to get rid of gender altogether, i.e. something like classical chinese.

  • 1
    1.The new cultural movement was about opposing tradition. zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/… 2. Language tend to evolve in mysterious ways, often not towards simplicity. I have a feel that the Chinese now is more complex than it was 20 years ago. Aug 6, 2016 at 7:11

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.