Chinese Language Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for students, teachers, and linguists wanting to discuss the finer points of the Chinese language. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this community
As far as I understand, the dog radical (犭) was used for all non-Han ethnic groups before the Chinese Communist Party took power on the mainland. Is there truth to that? If so:
I can only provide a partial answer:
Many of the characters used in the names of non-Han ethnic groups were originally derogatory. After the founding of the PRC, the government conceptualized New China as a multiethnic state (多民族国家), and they changed many of the characters that were perceived as derogatory. I don't know if this process started under the KMT (国民党), as you suggest, and I also don't know why no one bothered to fix the one for the Jews.
Edit: The character for the Jews is a little different from those for other ethnic groups. For one, it was not an invented character. Rather, (in modern-ish times), existing characters were picked for the transliteration. Also, although it does have the dog radical, the other meanings of the character are not negative (or related at all to animals). The only extant meanings (besides being part of 犹太) are seem (好像；如同) and still (还；仍然).
Your question is totally wrong on itself!
“犭”（反犬旁/犬部） is a radical of Chinese Characters (Han-Zi,汉字) which is only for forming/making up some single Chinese Characters.
In the creating era aka ancient times, people used “犭”(a radical, the variant of 犬 i.e. dogs) to make some Characters which is with some relation to beast such as 猴(monkeys)、狮(lions)、狐狸(foxes)、猛(violent, adj.)...
The original design of Character “犹” which traditional form is “猶” is as follows:
犭 <---> 犬 ----> Dogs
酋 <---> 加时加料酿制的醇酒 ----> Doing a materials&time-consuming brew ---> 长时间精心培育 ---> Carefully nurtured for a long time
犭 + 酋 ---> 猶 ---> The dogs which were nurtured for a long time ----> Dogs/Something meet the target or template ----> 如同、相似 ---> be similar to
To sum up: 犹 = 猶 = be similar to
“犹” sounds yóu/Yew/Jew. So, in the word “犹太人”, the Character “犹” is totally Phonological-TRANSLITERATION for יהודים (Yehudim)!
Exactly NOTHING is with any relation to dogs/beasts/derogating/ethnic/political at the Character “犹” in the word “犹太”.
Please do not make an exceeding interpretation:)
犹 is like this. It originally had to do with breeding and training dogs:本义：经过远景规划和长期选育得到的良犬。转义：与选育设想和目标大体符合的犬崽。转义的引申：如同，相似. It's only the modern meanings that have nothing to do with dogs.
Oct 21, 2012 at 18:29
A well bred dog (good result of careful breeding) => A well trained dog => Result similar to intended result => similar to. I agree totally with your assertions that 犹太 is a transliteration for יהודים (Yehudim) and that the use of 犹 was neither intended to be derogatory, nor it is likely to be taken as such. However, I would like to point out many old names for other ethnic groups are derogatory and transliterations at the same time. [cont]
Oct 21, 2012 at 20:58
獞. The character picked sounds something like what the Zhuang people call themselves, and it has negative connotations. Hence the later move to change it.
Oct 21, 2012 at 21:02
犭has nothing to do with dogs, it is often used in names of animals and its meaning can be rather neutral, such as 猛. Comparing human to animals may sound a little weird, but in modern Chinese, 犹 has four meanings and none of them is derogatory.
犹 have anything to do with dogs, but to say "犭has nothing to do with dogs" is misleading at best.
Oct 21, 2012 at 18:31
Wow. Indeed the original 犭 boji was meant as a derogatory for non-Han nationalities up until the Communist take over. Only after Stalin and Mao watched the ethnic problems in Yugoslavia did Mao change the usage from 'nationalities' within China's borders to 'ethnicities' for non-Han Chinese in China. The dog radical was consciously removed to demonstrate the unifying effect of Communism in China.
