I want to describe people wearing clothing as totally indecent and obscene, for instance because the clothing doesn’t remotely cover the buttocks. I am not talking about ordinary mini skirts or hot pants.

I definitely want to sound judging and don’t care to be nice to the person in question, but I don’t want the word in itself to be vulgar / unsuitable for use in writing.

I checked dictionaries for 'obscene' and found 下流. My Chinese friend says 下流 is very, very bad and out of proportion and recommended 輕佻, but dictionaries say this means 'skittish, flippant, giddy, frivolous'. These words seem much too cute to me, almost like I am not scolding the person.

How to grasp the difference between the two words?

  • I would say 有失体面 for indecent, and 放荡/浪荡 (similar to bitchy, a very offensive word) for obscene. So: 甲的衣着有失体面,看起来浪荡。
    – WDC
    Jun 19, 2018 at 1:44
  • 2
    Why don't you care to be nice?
    – Rodrigo
    Jun 19, 2018 at 3:23
  • 1
    @WDC If the Queen of England having an argument with a commoner, that would be 有失体面 (not befitting of one's status and reputation); 放荡 means 'wanton' , someone dress provocative doesn't mean she is wantonly acting out her desire
    – Tang Ho
    Jun 19, 2018 at 4:00
  • Is there a reason not to use the common terms 变态 ('perverted') or 黄 ('dirty')?
    – lly
    Jun 19, 2018 at 7:52
  • @lly in the situation German obszön was the first thing to come to my mind. I would say it Is almost identical to obscene in English. I translated it as 下流 and both my Chinese friend and my teacher protested and proposed 輕佻。But the translation of 輕佻 seemed barely disapproving, so I became curious. In my opinion 變態 would also apply. With 黃 I don’t have any experience.
    – Ludi
    Jun 19, 2018 at 9:53

6 Answers 6


'Obscene' is not 下流(no class/ bad taste) or 輕佻 (frivolous)

One definition of obscene is 不堪入目 , it is used to describe perverted, immoral act or behavior

For example: Taking a child from his mother and claim it is all for enforcing the law (which is not true) is an obscene (不堪入耳- too perverted and immoral to the ears) argument

Another definition of obscene is 淫褻 or 不雅 (also means 'unsightly'), it is used to describe extreme sexually suggestive content or display

I would describe the skirt 不雅, 不堪入目 or 淫褻 if I was judgmental, but I rather call it 大膽 (bold) or 開放 (open)

暴露 (revealing) is also a fitting description of that skirt

Edit: from all the answers: "下流, 輕佻, 不堪入目, 大膽, 開放, 淫褻, 變態, 不三不四, 有伤风化" are all 'subjective opinions' (you can't say any of them is wrong, but you can disagree with all of them)

Only 暴露 is an 'objective description' (it is a correct statement based on fact. You can't argue with fact, that skirt does expose a lot of skin)


下流 describes indecent action or person, sexually harass is the typical 下流的行为, a voyeur is a 下流的人.

輕佻(轻佻) is slightly literary, only used for woman, it describes her characteristic.

This word is not very popular in modern times due to the opening up of society.

For the picture in you question, I would say it is a:


People could imagine it immediately.

  • 1
    輕佻 apply to men too. 做人輕佻浮躁
    – Tang Ho
    Jun 28, 2018 at 16:04

My Chinese friend says 下流 is very, very bad and out of proportion and recommended 輕佻, but dictionaries say this means 'skittish, flippant, giddy, frivolous'. These words seem much too cute to me, almost like I am not scolding the person.

How [does one] grasp the difference between the two words?


You're not misunderstanding your vocabulary; you're misunderstanding the beliefs of the Chinese. Having talked this over with my Chinese friends, their understanding is that


Xiàliú ('indecent, base') or biàntài ('deviant, perverted') de rén are objectionable men.


Qīngtiāo ('flirty') de rén are women who take their social responsibilities lightly. Your photo can't be too objectionable because the woman is attractive; she's displaying herself openly and not being careful with her virtue, but she's nonetheless a prima facie object of beauty and grace.

The exact. same. outfit. worn by an overweight, aged, or otherwise unattractive woman would not be understood as xiàliú or biàntài and doesn't get the benefit of being considered qīngtiāo. They're just 噁心 (ěxin): 'nauseating, revolting, disgusting'. This is where Tang Ho's 不堪入目 (bùkānrùmù) comes in, which is why your teacher and friend didn't think of it. Your ultraminiskirt model is objectively not 'unsightly' nor 'hard to look at'.


''Bùsānbùsì'' (lit. 'neither three nor four' meaning 'neither one thing nor the other, shady') is the closest you can get to being judgmental towards attractive women (also men!) without slipping into full-on animalistic slurs and swears.


The dress itself is tài lùgǔ de ('too open; blunt; lewd'). SXZM's 情趣用品 (qíngqù yòngpǐn)—lit. 'funtime product(s)'—is the Chinese for anything you'd find in a sex shop, incl. those cheap overly skimpy costumes. There's no strong tradition of strippers in China so, to describe the women who wear qíngqù yòngpǐn, you have to just say 'she looks like a whore' or—what they do have a tradition of—'she's xǐtóufáng de' (洗頭房的). She looks like she works at a 'shampoo place'.

  • I strongly believe that 輕佻的人 is incorrect in this answer, as least it has nothing to do with genders.
    – Alex
    Jun 27, 2018 at 21:46
  • Note to OP: this answer is subjective / bias and misleading with some of the word's meaning.
    – Alex
    Jun 28, 2018 at 14:40
  • 輕佻: baike.baidu.com/item/%E8%BD%BB%E4%BD%BB/9732891
    – Alex
    Jun 28, 2018 at 14:40
  • 1
    露骨 means 'obvious / undisguised' not suitable in this instance
    – Tang Ho
    Jun 28, 2018 at 15:56

maybe "情趣用品 (sex toys) 耶?" with "asking attitude"

imo, a "real" miniskirt would be described as 輕佻, at least, it could be wear in public.

the link you provided, it could only be wear before. . .

describe people wearing clothing as totally indecent and obscene

another word would be "變態㗎" (~abnormal), with disapproval attitude :)

  • 2
    Not sure 变态 can be applied here for my best knowledge in Mandarin and Cantonese. Usually 变态 is for describing people, not clothing.
    – WDC
    Jun 19, 2018 at 1:49
  • then i must be 古老石山 lah :) Jun 19, 2018 at 2:51
  • btw, my suggestions are based on that "super-mini-skirt" of the link,not derived from the word "obscene" :) Jun 19, 2018 at 3:23
  • @WDC If the morality (more open or more closed) towards sex varies, thus will the word chosen, won't it?
    – Rodrigo
    Jun 19, 2018 at 3:28
  • 1
    @WDC 变态 means 'perverted', it is an adjective, sure it can be used to describe objects like publications or clothing
    – Tang Ho
    Jun 19, 2018 at 4:07

In your case I think "猥琐" is nice to use, and it's frequently used in oral Chinese.

"轻佻" occurs more in classical or written Chinese, normally we would not speak it out.

"下流" is more about immoral behavior, less about clothing.

  • zh.wiktionary.org/zh-hant/%E7%8C%A5%E7%90%90 猥瑣,原指舉止扭捏、拘束、不自然;或形容人體貌、氣質不佳。貶義詞。 常同時有自私的表現。 猥瑣 is mainly a description of one's disgusting behavior, personality or physical appearance.
    – Tang Ho
    Jun 19, 2018 at 7:06
  • further, as i think of, "猥瑣" is for male only, e.g. 猥瑣佬. absolutely not for female wearing such mini-mini-skirt :) Jun 19, 2018 at 9:05

轻佻 describes flippant/brazen behaviors, e.g. 他的行为举止很轻佻, or a person in general.

下流 can be more widely applied and is also more usual in modern Chinese. A behavior can be 下流, so can a book, a word, a gesture, a video etc. Also it is almost strictly constrained to sex-related connotations.

Neither of the words sounds really appropriate in this context of describing clothing though, especially if you don't know the person well. You may say the clothing looks too 开放,暴露,有伤风化 etc., which are somewhat more neutral in their connotations. It's not really a problem of being "nice" or not as you described in your question; you'd sound outright unnatural if you used either of those two words in this scenario.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.