5

These words don't have meanings that are similar, but why do they look nearly identical? Is it just a coincidence?

5
  • 说文解字:年,甲骨文字形,上“禾”,下“人”. Probably comes from some ancient calligraphy, if you check the "字源字形" section. – Shaw Jan 19 at 1:58
  • 1
    Why do you think they look similar? Do western people and Chinese people really have an incompatible pictorial mindset? I feel that they look extremely different. I cannot feel any similarities. By the way, we do have similar Chinese characters, for example, > 己 self > > 已 already > > 巳 the sixth symbol of the Terrestrial Branches > 戌 the eleventh symbol of the Terrestrial Branches > > 戍 garrison > > 戊 the fifth symbol of the Celestial Stems > 土 soil > > 士 advisors, minister > 未 future > > 末 last – Victor Jan 19 at 2:00
  • 3
    toss in 牛 and now you've got yourself a conspiracy – 小奥利奥 Jan 19 at 2:00
  • 1
    P and R look more like eachother tbh – Introsings Jan 19 at 13:40
  • anyone who pretends like they dont see the similarity is being pretentious – 小奥利奥 Jan 19 at 20:17
9

Yes, this is a coincidence. Generally, if the modern shape is confusing, you need to go back further in time to look at characters' original shapes and purposes to make sense of what's going on. Also, the meaning noon for 「午」 is a phonetic loan; that is, the shape 「午」 represented a word that sounded similar to an unrelated existing word meaning noon, and the shape has nothing to do with the meaning noon.

「年」 originally depicted a person 「人」 carrying grain plants 「禾」 on their back, indicating the meaning harvest period > year; check out Is the character(or its etymology) related to the mythical beast in Chinese mythology? for the glyph origins of 「年」.


Glyph origins of 「午」

時期
字體
字形 參考資料

午 1.1
合集13475

午 2.38.8
合集34621
西周
午 作冊䰧卣
集成5432
西周
午 縣妀簋
集成4269
戰國
午 子禾子釜
集成10374

午 午部
說文解字
西漢
午 秦射42
武威漢簡

午

「午」 originally depicted a large wooden pestle used to pound or de-husk grainy foods such as rice. The word that 「午」 originally represented is now written as 「杵」, formed by adding semantic 「木」 (wood), and 「午」 forms or formed parts of other characters such as 「舂」 (picture of two hands 「廾」 using a pestle 「午」 and mortar 「臼」 > to pound, grind) and 「御」 (originally a picture of a kneeling person 「卩」 operating a pestle 「午」).

As mentioned earlier, 「午」 is a phonetically borrowed character for the word noon, as pestle does not have anything to do with noon.

There is a peculiar pattern across several older characters: blobs on a vertical line tend to expand outwards into horizontal lines, and this is a simplistic description of what happened to the shape of 「午」 as well. You may check out the following glyph evolution tables for comparison:


References:

2
  • 2
    That table though...looks so clean. – Mou某 Jan 19 at 13:50
  • 1
    @Mou某 About time SE finally implemented proper table support! – dROOOze Jan 19 at 16:08
0

I can give you a general explanation of why many characters in Chinese look similar, but it is out of my reach to shed light on the details of this specific example.

The general reason comes because most literate individuals of Mandarin Chinese know and use between 3,000 and 4,000 different characters, but all of these characters are built by combining only around 200 components known as radicals. The situation is even more extreme as the 10 most used radicals appear in 10,665 characters (or 23% of all the dictionary entries). Radicals often indicate the meaning of the character, known as the semantic compound, and / or the sound, known as the phonetic compound. In some cases, the original semantic or phonological connection has become obscure, even more as many characters have been modified and simplified over the years.

On practice, this means you will encounter many characters that look similar because they use the same radicals. The compositions of your example are (according to https://en.wiktionary.org):

  • 午: 𠂉十 or 丿干.
  • 年: 𠂉㐄 or 午 一丨 or 午丄.

Understanding the exact nature of the radicals might be difficult. In the wiktionary entries for these words you can find some explanations of their etymological origin. I suggest you look at them if you are interested.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.