Are there any words in Chinese of 2 more syllables where there isn't a glottal stop between the syllables such that each syllable is not pronounced clearly, that a final consonant and initial consonant could be analyzed as a consonant cluster? I'm asking this question mostly in reference to Chinese languages descended from Middle Chinese, but wouldn't mind knowing about Min Chinese, or Chinese languages that diverged even earlier, like Waxiang.

  • I've previously asked this question: chinese.stackexchange.com/q/22363/4136 which talks about something that is known as 连读 in layman's terms. It seems to be a feature of Northern topolects. The words 意思 and 认识 seem to be two examples that I remember very clearly. – Mou某 Feb 17 at 15:24
  • That's not quite what I'm asking. I'm not talking about 认识=rèn shí⇨rènsh in Mandarin or 唔係=m̖ ha̱i⇨咪=ma̗i in Cantonese, but a multisyllabic word without a glottal stop between syllables. – kwaalaateimaa Feb 18 at 0:25
  • The term I'm looking for might be "disyllable" – kwaalaateimaa Feb 24 at 2:20
  • 1
    I still believe that the phenomenon that I described fits what you were asking. The examples of 意思 and 认识 are not akin to examples like 不要 ---> 嫑 or 不用 ---> 甭, which are known as 合音, but rather it is more of an ending neutral tone with 连读 features. – Mou某 Feb 25 at 12:58
  • No, you did not answer what I was looking for. I was asking for a word like 'lizard' or 'chicken' in English that does not have a glottal stop in the middle, but in a Chinese language. – kwaalaateimaa Mar 1 at 13:30

I think this question should be "Are there any multi-syllabic words in Chinese with a glottal stop?"

In common speech, (almost) no words have an actual glottal stop in there, whereas the sound is the one identified by the IPA symbol /ʔ/ and defined as:

a type of consonantal sound [...] produced by obstructing airflow in the vocal tract [...].

Typical poly-syllable words aren't pronounced with such an airflow obstruction, because the sounds are distinct enough. This is the case of encounters of:

  • vowel+consonant (肌肉,主张)
  • consonant+consonant (晚饭,面条)
  • vowel or velar nasal (the ng sound /ŋ/) + semivowel (the approximants /w/), as in (储物,掌握), where, even if the sounds do blend to a certain degree, they are still distinct enough.

The only case where you do have an almost mandatory glottal stop /ʔ/ in speech is nasal (/ŋ/ or /n/) + vowel. Why? Because syllables with nasal initial in Mandarin are valid: nao, nan, nen etc. In these cases the glottal stop is needed to properly signal to the listener which syllable we are pronouncing. This is also the reason why in pinyin it is used an apex (apostrophe) sign.

For example 晚安 in pinyin is wan'an and in IPA /wanʔan/, otherwise you could simply confuse it with wa+nan. That there's no common word with this very pinyin is irrelevant. Other fairly common examples are 感恩 gan'en (/kanʔen/) and 深奥 shen'ao (/ʃɜnʔaɔ/)

The vowel+vowel case (对岸,马鞍, 骄傲) doesn't require mandatory glottal stop (even though you definitely can add one) because the encounter of vowels can't be mistaken for a valid syllable, where nasal+vowel can.

  • 2
    "Without syllables distinctly separated" might have been closer to what I meant. – kwaalaateimaa Apr 1 at 2:56

Theoretically, no; colloquially, yes.
Glottal stop appears before a syllable "without consonant", like 棉袄 (mián'ǎo, [mjɛnʔau], "cotton coat"). This applies to all such syllables. However, in daily spoken language, emphasis on glottal stops is quite unnatural, so a possible implementation may be [mjɛ̃ːau].

Reference: 現代標準漢語音系

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.