A carrier pigeon brings a letter. In the sentence ”鸽子的腿上多了一封信”, I do not understand the use of 多了, unless it is used here as a verb meaning "to have", as in "the carrier pigeon had on it's leg a letter". However, I haven't found any grammar or discussion about 多 or 多了 that points to it being used with such meaning.



To translate 多了 literally would be confusing as it literally means "an extra or more of something", since there is only one letter attached to the pigeon's leg not an "extra" letter.

I would translate 多了 in the context of the sentence as "appears to have", i.e. "On the pigeon's leg it appears to have a letter"

Because the word 多 in this sense does not mean "many / a lot / extra" but to carry the idea that "there was nothing before, but there is something now"; as Alan Zzz puts it, (from 0 to 1)

Thus, we can say, "With a quick wave the magician's hand 多了 a rabbit"


多 = more, much, extra

多了一封信 = to have an extra letter

Another example:


There is an extra person in our group.

In this case, the sentence can be translated to:

There is an extra letter on the carrier pigeon's leg.

Note: This sentence doesn't make sense as a single sentence. The pigeon has to be mentioned somewhere in the previous text.

  • Here's the full sentence. 几个月过去,就当父子俩几乎不抱任何希望的时候,小鸽子却回来了!它的腿上多了一封信。The thing is, however, when the pigeon went away it did not take any letter with him. And nowhere in the text was any mention of a previous letter, so how come this is an "extra" letter?
    – MBdr
    May 22 '21 at 22:17
  • @MBdr So here 多了 is indicating the number of letter increases (from 0 to 1). I am not a native English speaker so sorry for any confusion.
    – Alan Zzz
    May 22 '21 at 22:36
  • If the pigeon's leg already has letters, 多了一封信 would mean 'has an extra letter'

  • If the pigeon's leg didn't have anything before, 多了一封信 would mean 'there is a letter (that wasn't there before)'


  • If a room was occupied, 房中多了一人 would mean 'there is an extra person in the room'

  • If a room was unoccupied, 房中多了一人 would mean 'There is a person in the room (that was unoccupied before)

We could omit the words in brackets in English if the reader can presume the pigeon's leg had nothing before and the room was unoccupied from the context


But the pigeon is back! And there is a letter on its leg

But the pigeon is back! And its leg has a letter on it

the reader can presume the pigeon's leg has nothing before, so we don't need to mention it

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.