I understand that the overall meaning is "the titular superhero has been overshadowed by the myriad of powerful villains he has fought against," but I don't see the purpose off adding that "所衬托的," and trying to translate that/see its function here in the sentence is driving me crazy.

I know that the meaning of 衬托 is to set off or serve as a foil to. This makes me think that it serves to modify the "fought against" or "对抗" part of the sentence, but I just am not sure, and do not know how to integrate 衬托 into the English translation specifically.

  • 1
    It is actually a wrong sentence, or a 病句(sick sentence) in Chinese.
    – T-Pioneer
    Commented Apr 23, 2022 at 8:45

2 Answers 2


This sentence has a lot of problems

  1. 所 in 所衬托的 is not needed

  2. 的/dé/ in 衬托的 should be replaced with 得/dé/

(another case of 的/dé/, 得/dé/, 地/dé/ confusion)

  1. 衬托(to set off) is the wrong choice of word for " contrast". It should be 对比 (compare/ contrast)



[be]......[contrasted] pale in comparsion

Something that was being 衬托 (set off) is always shown in a positive way

  • in this case, the so-call superhero is overshadowed by his powerful enemies = 被比较下来 (been compared down)

Also, 反派角色 is better than 反面角色 here

  • Thank you. I was driving myself crazy trying to find out what that "的" was modifying in this sentence. Turns out it was just wrong. That's a bit worrysome, considering I got the sentence from zaojv.com, which I assumed to be a reliable site for practicing sentence reading.
    – AndrewO
    Commented Apr 23, 2022 at 0:02
  • 1
    There is a discussion on 的 pronounced as "di" rather then "de" in its spoken form. chinese.stackexchange.com/questions/318/… Commented Apr 23, 2022 at 3:13

Sympathy for superheroes!

I agree with Tang Ho, 友 should be 反 and you don't want 所衬托, just 衬托.

As for 的 or 得 or 地, Becky asked about this somewhere here (I'm useless at finding old threads). Someone answered:

Prior to the 1950s, many Chinese writers made no distinction between 的、地 or 得

That may have led to the contentious 的。

This insubstantial superhero
was eclipsed by all of his opponents, each of whom possessed superior powers.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.