Timeline for Using ＂的＂ with people
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2016 at 11:05 | comment | added | Tang Ho♦ | "No verb act on an object" would make an incomplete sentence. "addresses a second person" is one. May be I over complicated the answer. I could simply state " All possessive 的 can be omitted in a complete sentence, and a complete sentence must have a verb and object. An address to a second person is not a complete sentence, therefore, we cannot omit the possessive 的 | |
| Nov 2, 2016 at 8:39 | comment | added | user6065 | 有某些用户只不过重复其以前说的话而这样做，就避免回答评论所提出的问题 some users evade issues raised in comments by repeating points made earlier | |
| Nov 2, 2016 at 6:55 | comment | added | Tang Ho♦ | It is in my answer- in the sentence 我(的)女儿打了人, 女儿 is a third person. Since there's no verb acting on 女儿, according to my answer, the possessive 的 should not be omitted. However, 我(的)女儿 in this sentence is the subject, not the of object. Therefore, the possessive 的 can still be omitted. | |
| Nov 2, 2016 at 6:34 | comment | added | user6065 | other cases when "there is no verb acting on the object" , the new example is again as in Q, 我勇敢的女儿 addresses a second person | |
| Nov 2, 2016 at 5:50 | comment | added | Tang Ho♦ | You meant other cases that possessive 的 cannot be omitted? Most likely when it is actually adjective suffix 的, For example: 你好吗？我勇敢的女儿 | |
| Nov 2, 2016 at 5:31 | comment | added | user6065 | answer seems to mention only one case when "there is no verb acting on the object" ,namely that of the Q, in which it occurs as a form of address, are there other cases? | |
| Nov 2, 2016 at 3:19 | history | edited | Tang Ho♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 135 characters in body
|
| Nov 1, 2016 at 13:19 | vote | accept | Sarah Groß | ||
| Nov 1, 2016 at 12:53 | history | edited | Tang Ho♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
add more examples
|
| Nov 1, 2016 at 12:38 | history | edited | Tang Ho♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Change to simplified characters
|
| Nov 1, 2016 at 12:22 | history | answered | Tang Ho♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |