Timeline for In 我去北京旅行, is 北京 the object? If not, what *is* it?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2017 at 7:04 | vote | accept | Sweeper | ||
| Mar 2, 2017 at 5:59 | |||||
| Feb 17, 2017 at 7:04 | comment | added | Sweeper | Okay I understand now. | |
| Feb 16, 2017 at 23:36 | comment | added | Pedroski | Quite seriously, my advice to you is: do not try to apply the flawed concepts of Western Grammar to Chinese. Western Grammar does not even describe Western languages properly. For at least 4000 years, the West has had a verb fixation. Basic concepts, such as subject or sentence, remain undefined and undefinable. 我问： 你多大? According to Western grammar, this 句子 has no subject, because subject is conceived in some vague way as an argument of a verb. Chinese scholars must develop their own ideas. In my opinion, 去北京 is quite simply 'to where'. It describes 我的目标。 where and when are very important. | |
| Feb 16, 2017 at 7:04 | comment | added | Sweeper | Okay, so 去北京 is the 状语？ | |
| Feb 15, 2017 at 23:44 | history | answered | Pedroski | CC BY-SA 3.0 |