Timeline for Chinese character decomposition
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Apr 29, 2021 at 15:41 | history | suggested | 大胳膊雅各布 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Minor grammar.
|
| Apr 29, 2021 at 14:09 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Apr 29, 2021 at 15:41 | |||||
| Jan 22, 2021 at 3:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackChinese/status/1352450930445266944 | ||
| Jan 21, 2021 at 0:25 | answer | added | 大胳膊雅各布 | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jun 19, 2018 at 21:33 | comment | added | John Frazer | @drooze What do you want to say? The OP asked a clear question and came up with some clear examples that look simple and correct. Are these examples valid or not? Does 做 decompose into 亻十口夂 or not? | |
| Jun 19, 2018 at 4:37 | comment | added | Vitaly Osipov | Moreover, they all do, and here's a huge repo of decompositions github.com/amake/cjk-decomp | |
| Jun 18, 2018 at 17:45 | answer | added | dROOOze | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jun 18, 2018 at 17:36 | answer | added | zyy | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jun 18, 2018 at 17:35 | comment | added | Stumpy Joe Pete | en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_character_classification | |
| Jun 18, 2018 at 17:29 | answer | added | 水巷孑蠻 | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jun 18, 2018 at 17:27 | comment | added | dROOOze | It’s not a generic yes or no, it depends on the character you’re looking at. So it’s sometimes a yes and sometimes a no and sometimes an illusion due to millenia of script evolution. | |
| Jun 18, 2018 at 17:24 | comment | added | Dims | @droooze just "yes" or "no" and if "no", then "why" | |
| Jun 18, 2018 at 17:22 | comment | added | dROOOze | A comprehensive title which deals with this is Qiu Xigui’s Chinese Writing. It takes a lengthy book to explain. | |
| Jun 18, 2018 at 16:46 | history | asked | Dims | CC BY-SA 4.0 |