Skip to main content
added 156 characters in body
Source Link
水巷孑蠻
  • 16.3k
  • 2
  • 17
  • 36

maybe "大中華區". most multinational corporations used this term term to describe the regions you mentioned.

such usage is correct, in context of recent decadesnowadays, or nowadaysrecent decades. historically, the same regions are parts oftaiwan was integrated into the chinese empire after ~1683. before that time, formosa was colonised by the dutch, spanish.

history of taiwan

last, and most importantly is: how do you define "chinese speakers".

there're many ethnicities in "greater china" can speak chinese, they've their own cultures, languages and ideas of state / nation. so, "politically neutral" is, imo, unattainable.

it's better to seek a term that's vague, fuzzy enough; that no-one want to waste time and effort to argue its precise definition.

maybe "大中華區". most multinational corporations used this term to describe the regions you mentioned.

such usage is correct, in context of recent decades, or nowadays. historically, the same regions are parts of the chinese empire.

last, and most importantly is: how do you define "chinese speakers".

there're many ethnicities in "greater china" can speak chinese, they've their own cultures, languages and ideas of state / nation. so, "politically neutral" is, imo, unattainable.

it's better to seek a term that's vague, fuzzy enough; that no-one want to waste time and effort to argue its precise definition.

maybe "大中華區". most multinational corporations used this term to describe the regions you mentioned.

such usage is correct, in context of nowadays, or recent decades. historically, taiwan was integrated into the chinese empire after ~1683. before that time, formosa was colonised by the dutch, spanish.

history of taiwan

last, and most importantly is: how do you define "chinese speakers".

there're many ethnicities in "greater china" can speak chinese, they've their own cultures, languages and ideas of state / nation. so, "politically neutral" is, imo, unattainable.

it's better to seek a term that's vague, fuzzy enough; that no-one want to waste time and effort to argue its precise definition.

Source Link
水巷孑蠻
  • 16.3k
  • 2
  • 17
  • 36

maybe "大中華區". most multinational corporations used this term to describe the regions you mentioned.

such usage is correct, in context of recent decades, or nowadays. historically, the same regions are parts of the chinese empire.

last, and most importantly is: how do you define "chinese speakers".

there're many ethnicities in "greater china" can speak chinese, they've their own cultures, languages and ideas of state / nation. so, "politically neutral" is, imo, unattainable.

it's better to seek a term that's vague, fuzzy enough; that no-one want to waste time and effort to argue its precise definition.